As the Junta de Andalucía has
(more or less) legalised the majority of those ‘viviendas alegales’ (can they now be sold or inherited?), allowing
them to receive services like water and electricity – and to be taxed – we look
at the reactions.
From a lawyer writing at Spanish Property Insight here:
‘Planning amnesty in Andalucía, just don't call it an amnesty!’. He quotes the
old saw ‘“If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck,
then it probably is a duck.”’. From Sur
in English here,
‘The Junta takes a big step towards in regularising many more of the 327,000
illegal homes in Andalucía. While the properties will still be illegal, they
will be given the right to services and judicial security by extending the
existing AFO designation’. From La Vanguadia
here, ‘The owners see this regularization decree as the light at
the end of the tunnel of urban folly’. El
Mundo has an opinion piece attacking ‘the amnesty of the parcelistas’: ‘...We do not quite understand - and it is not a
problem of ours - how the government of the Most Reverend Juanma Moreno
congratulates itself - with metal trumpetry! - for his decision to legalize the
327,000 illegal homes that exist in the Republic of Noddy, built outside the law
by owners who knew per-fec-tly well the house of snakes which they were
constructing...’. The ecologists are similarly aghast at the ‘amnesty’, saying
they plan to appeal the ruling.
Our own opinion is that, with
enough regular urbanisations and homes built – legally – in flood plains
(Orihuela or Puerto Rey anyone?), homes built safely in the middle of nowhere
should hardly be an issue, since they bring a little wealth, life and
employment to otherwise moribund villages in el quinto pino.
Our support and thanks to both AUAN and SOHA.
Our support and thanks to both AUAN and SOHA.
No comments:
Post a Comment