As the Government and the Spanish people take a month's holiday (or as much of it as they can afford), let's look at the current crop of corruption cases.
This session appears as part of my Business over Tapas weekly report. Find it here.
......
There are many obstacles appearing to attempt to tone down the Caso Montoro. From elDiario.es, we read: ‘The 'miracle' of the Montoro case: the hindrances to investigating the all-powerful Finance Minister under the Partido Popular. The prosecutor in charge of the case attempted to open a separate investigation to expand the case with the help of the Tax Agency and the Mossos d'Esquadra (Catalan police), but the opposition of the chief anti-corruption prosecutor and the passivity of the UCO (Guardia Civil judicial department) made it impossible’. The article says: ‘The judicial investigation into the consulting firm Equipo Económico, which has indicted Cristóbal Montoro and nine of his collaborators at the Ministry of Finance, enters a new phase after seven years with the recent lifting of secrecy. Judge Rubén Rus must take statements from the 28 suspects unless any of the appeals filed against the investigation, which has lasted more than seven years, are unsuccessful…’El País says that much of the Montoro material has been sealed by investigators.
Montoro’s most famous remark (from back in 2010) was: "Let Spain fall and we will build it up again". It often shows up in political articles.
Keeping up the pressure. From 20Minutos here: ‘Judges and prosecutors call for García Ortiz's resignation: "It's unnecessary to put the Prosecutor's Office through this ordeal"’. As the case against Ayuso’s boyfriend stumbles along (the court asks for a little under four years for corruption), the main victim of this story is the PSOE-appointed Attorney General). Maldita has ‘questions and answers about the Attorney General’s imputation’.
More on the trumped-up case against the Attorney General: ‘A prosecutor in the dock without evidence: justice in Spain in free fall’. At Spanish Revolution, we are bitterly told of ‘When the robe weighs more than the truth and the Supreme Court turns the presumption of innocence into a bad joke’.
The website says: ‘The Supreme Court has decided to prosecute the Attorney General of the State, Álvaro García Ortiz, for the alleged crime of revealing secrets in the case of Ayuso's boyfriend. There is no solid evidence. There are no witnesses pointing the finger at him. Only weak clues and a narrative so flimsy that it would collapse in any court that respected basic rights. Meanwhile, the dissenting opinion of Judge Andrés Palomo del Arco exposes the botched job: he places the head of the Public Prosecutor's Office in the dock with a string of conjectures, denying the value of the testimony of journalists who saw the famous email before the prosecutor himself, demanding that they waive the constitutional protection of their sources, and signing an order that seems more like a political order than a legal decision…’ elDiario.es also has an opinion: ‘The incredible case of the explosive email – They want to try and imprison the Attorney General because the Supreme Court Justice Hurtado believes whatever he wants to believe and has turned an email—debunking a hoax—into a cluster bomb, which could also bring down the government.
In short, it’s a mess designed – as usual – to weaken the socialist government.
The Boyfriend of Ayuso’s Case has stumbled once again. From El País here: ‘The judge in the Alberto González Amador case withdraws mid-proceedings: So now what?’ The judge had been investigating the boyfriend for the past sixteen months, but she’s now 65 and has promptly retired. Another judge is suggested (he’s a year older than the last one, but shows no sign of slowing down…)
There’s also a fuss about Judge Peinado’s country-house and swimming pool in the municipality of La Adrada (Ávila) which was listed as a warehouse many years ago. It appears that the judge got away with it after the paperwork was shelved in the townhall until the property was deemed ‘legal’. The judge is now suing some social media accuser for 25,000 euros. The story at El Plural here and here.
A spate of resignations has followed the Noelia Núñez (the PP spokesperson for two days) event. These include politicians and various officials who appear to have (no doubt inadvertently) amplified their academic achievements. 20Minutos has ‘The resumé crisis: The Partido Popular asserts that "inflating resumés is not the same as falsifying qualifications"’. Quite!
It must be quite common in political circles to claim titles one doesn’t have. Just in Valencia, we read: ‘Twenty senior Mazón officials are breaking the law by not registering the university degrees they claim to possess’. Worse still, the president of the Senado has also been obliged to adjust his scholastic qualifications.
A word that came into the Spanish language back in 2003: ‘Tamayazo’. Wiki tells us that during the vote to construct the new Madrid Government of 30th June, 2003, ‘Two elected parliamentarians from the PSOE, Eduardo Tamayo and María Teresa Sáez Laguna, prevented the election of Rafael Simancas as the new president of the Community of Madrid by abstaining from the second investiture vote. This case of defection ultimately forced a repeat election in October of that same year, after which Esperanza Aguirre (PP) became the new regional president…’ While, unproven, the suspicion is that they were ‘bought off’, and thus un tamayazo means a politician (aka un tránsfuga) changing his support when by doing so, his erstwhile team would lose an important vote.